Mon 23 Oct 2006
Blog Post Titles: what are the important factors?
Posted by Mark White, Blog Consultant in Marketing with Blogs , SEO in Blogs , Writing your Business BlogI was recently reading a post by Chris Lake over at e-Consultancy discussing the relative merits of Witty vs Descriptive Headlines for your blog posts.
Interesting stuff and some nice examples but not quite the whole story.
Firstly though, why are they important? They are important because they act just like a newspaper headline - they attract the readers’ attention and encourage them to read the full article. With the huge amount of information that we have nowadays it is vitally important that we attract people’s attention in the short space of time that we are given to achieve this and generally we only have the post title at our disposal to achieve this.
However, we need to remember that we are in fact trying to attract the attention of two groups: readers (or should I clarify by saying ‘human readers’) and Search Engines. Unfortunately, they don’t react in the same way and they aren’t attracted by the same things. While human readers are attracted by humour, nuance, plays on words as well as information, Search Engines are attracted purely by the words which we provide.
But there’s more!! More? Yes, there’s more! Because we are working on-line, we have to remember what people actually see in different situations and places - bear with me here, it’s important!
In RSS Feeds, the title of your post appears, as it does in the main Blog Search Engines such as Technorati or Google Blog Search. As people browse here, then the title is critical because it is the only real element that you can use to attract their attention as they skim through the articles on offer.
However, in the main Search Engine Results pages (such as Google and Yahoo) what you see is not the title of your post but the “Title Tag”. This is distinct from your post title and something which you can control separately. The “Title Tag” is doubly important because it is a key element that the main Search Engines look at when ranking pages - they do take note of the title of your post, but they take much more interest in the “Title Tag”.
So which way to go? My own preference is to keep the title interesting without making it too cryptic, and I always try to include the main keyword for the article. I then make sure that I modify the “Title Tag” to ensure that that is keyword rich - if you want more details then you ‘ll find more information in my SEO series.
So, try to appeal to both audiences. You are best placed to know what will appeal to your readers and you can guess that, for Search Engines, the principal keyword phrases for the post are going to be key. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to combine both as well as you can.




















October 27th, 2006 at 5:49 am
Right on! Its two different stories altogether targeting SEs and human traffic.
Take your blog post for example. Its optimized for SEs! “Blog Post Titles: what are the important factors?” You have your keywords.
To optimize for human visitors. It could be something more like. “Find out this ONE thing to tweak on your blog… and you will get 254% more visitors everyday!” Its psychology, Gestalt, inducing curiosity!
Of course, knowing to balance the two - that’s mastery
October 27th, 2006 at 10:59 am
Kian Ann, Thanks for your comment. You’re right, I tend to be more factual than sensationalist in my titles hence the one that you see on this post.
However, you also have to take into consideration your readership. Personally, I don’t think they would expect the “long sales webpage” style in your second example - it wouldn’t sit right with what I write about and how I say it. Personally, I think the only time I’d use that format would be for irony, to be honest.
But does it work? Almost certainly with some audiences. Thanks again for your comment - it’s much appreciated.